The Current State of CAQDAS is Insufficient for Open Science Qualitative Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14279/eceasst.v85.2709Abstract
Qualitative research, which relies on diverse methods and complex data, is increasingly utilising Qualitative Data Analysis Software (QDAS), also known as Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis (CAQDAS). While enhancing data management, coding and transparency, the current CAQDAS landscape is dominated by proprietary software and presents significant challenges for open science principles. High costs, vendor lock-in and closed data formats hinder collaboration, data reuse and reproducibility. This study conducted a systematic review of 28 CAQDAS tools, which were identified through comprehensive searches. The review examined the tools' licensing, costs, platform availability, format support, interoperability, collaboration, AI integration, adherence to the FAIR principles for research software, auditability, security, and sustainability from the perspective of stakeholders. The findings reveal that, although proprietary tools offer broad format support and some collaboration features, they are expensive and often lack sufficient on-premises options for sensitive data, locking users into specific workflows. Open-source alternatives exist but often suffer from limited sustainable funding, smaller communities and less comprehensive features or documentation, which makes them less accessible, particularly for non-technical users. Furthermore, many tools lack the robust real-time collaboration and detailed audit trails that are necessary for transparency and intersubjective validation. AI integration is emerging, but it often operates as a black box, limiting user control and raising privacy concerns due to reliance on commercial vendors. Furthermore, support for FAIR principles, security policies and plug-in architectures remains marginal across the field. In conclusion, the current state of CAQDAS is inadequate for fully supporting open science qualitative research practices, such as collaborative, transparent and reproducible analysis, and long-term data archiving. There is a critical need to develop accessible, extensible and collaborative open-source CAQDAS tools via community-driven approaches, in order to advance both research methods and teaching.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jan Küster, Karsten D. Wolf

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
